Wheel Tech, Part III: Wheel Diameter’s Effect on Performance

This is the third in a series on how wheel choice can affect your car’s performance.

Should you fit 14s, 15s, 16s, 17s, 19s, 22s? This article will help you decide what size is right for you.

I’ve been working on debunking some long standing myths in this series and if you missed last week or the week before, I recommend that you check those out as well:

Last week I explained how changing wheel width too much on a street car can change your car’s handling at the limit and how it can actually make for some dangerous situations in the more extreme cases. We discovered that wider wheels do not always (and in most cases never) increase the car’s ability to grip the ground in the corners and how wider tires do not necessarily put more rubber on the ground.

Fortunately, while wheel width is limited by suspension geometry, wheel diameter can be whatever you like, as long as it fits and you’re willing to accept certain trade offs. But before you go thinking it’s a total free for all, let’s talk about the ways wheel diameter affects your car’s performance and the trade offs you make, especially when going larger.

The trade offs with bigger wheels are: (in no particular order) reliability (resistance to bending), slightly changed center of gravity, increases in power required to turn the wheels, harder steering effort in non-PS vehicles, possible decreases in cornering performance, added expense, ride quality suffers, and possible gearing change.

The upsides are fewer but pretty obvious and rather important to some enthusiasts: looks, better stability during spirited driving (sidewall temperatures do not soar) and the ability to fit over larger brake rotors.

Sizing

When selecting a wheel/tire combo, you should always select the size with the closest to factory overall wheel/tire diameter, regardless of the rim size. You can use a calculator like this one to calculate the difference in overall diameter from your stock wheel to the new one. Within 0.8% is good, I like to stay with 0.3% or less whenever possible.

The tire size you use with whatever wheel diameter you pick can be messed with a little bit to achieve the right overall diameter.

Tire sizes are usually given like this: 215/45/17. What this means is that the tire is 215mm wide, the sidewall is ~ 45% of the 215mm width and the last number is the rim size the tire is for. If you want more information on tire sizing and specifically decoding tire sizes on tires, check this link.

Sidewall & Overall Size Considerations

With wheel diameter increases come a decrease in sidewall size in order to maintain the same overall tire+wheel combo size. It’s important to stay as close to the stock tire+wheel combo size as the overall wheel size affects gearing.

Smaller wheels improve acceleration at the expense of top end, and taller wheels decrease acceleration while theoretically increasing top speed (though in practice top speed is limited by power and drag long before tire size. Increasing tire size usually also hurts top end acceleration and top speed as it decreases the engine’s ability to overcome the air drag holding the car back). There will also be changes in your speedometer reading in most cars with different sized wheels.

In any case, making the overall wheel/tire combo taller or shorter will again affect suspension geometry. You can change it a small amount without any real adverse effects but try to stay as close as possible when choosing a new size.

The big “gotcha” with sidewall size is that the smaller the sidewall, the less protection your probably expensive rims will have from the inevitable pothole or road debris. You can run lower profile tires with stronger wheels, but in general the stronger the wheel, the heavier it is as well.

I assume most of you are running fairly lightweight aluminum wheels that while strong, will not do well with less than a 45 section height against road imperfections. The sweet spot in my experience is to aim for a tire between a 40 and 55 section height. If you are running a 60 or higher section height, you’ll have a great ride but you’ll have odd handling at the limit due to excessive tire sidewall flex.

You’ll also probably experience premature failure on a road course due to excessive temperature in the tires from all that sidewall flex. If you’re running 40 and lower, you’ll have a very rough ride and be prone to bending rims.

From all the experts I’ve talked to, it seems that around the 45 sidewall size is the best all around. You’ll find this is a very popular size with modern cars (especially since the trend has been towards larger and larger wheels on factory cars). This means these tires will usually be reasonably priced and have a lot of available treads and compounds to choose from. Avoid “weird” sizes as they’re expensive and you’ll have few choices in performance rubber.

Small sidewalls are very stiff, great for cornering “feel” but terrible for ride quality and  straight line stopping and acceleration  (more on that later). Stiffer sidewalls do not give any additional grip.

As the sidewall size goes down, the weight of the tire stays the same or gets bigger.

However, as a result of an increase in wheel diameter, this makes the weight distribution of the wheel+tire combo worse – the heaviest part (the tire) is now further away from the center of the wheel – refer to Part I for why that’s bad. In short, it robs precious power from getting to the road. Many guys spend so much time focusing on the wheel weight but never even think about the tire weight and its effect on the weight distribution of the wheel.

Warning: Never make the mistake of choosing a TIRE by its weight. Usually a tire’s weight is directly proportional to how much reinforcement is inside the tire. Cheap tires are often lightweight, but only because they cheeped out on the sidewall reinforcement. I actually had a popular cheap tire go out of round because it was so cheaply made inside. Choose tires based on tread and compound – never by weight. DO consider the weight of the tire when picking the size of your wheel, however.

Larger sidewalls allow better ride quality, better straight line launch, braking and do not necessarily decrease grip but may make the car handle less precisely. In other words, the sidewall flexes so the steering response will be slower and you get a lot more “roll” in the bends. Too big of a sidewall can cause excessive tire temperatures due to a lot of flexing about and possible failure in race conditions so it still is ideal to keep relatively low profile sidewalls on performance applications as we mentioned earlier.

You’ll notice that drag racing slicks always have very tall sidewalls. You never see low profile drag slicks. This is because when a drag car launches, the tire actually deforms and ripples up to create an even fatter patch of rubber on the ground and to generate ‘bite’ into the ground. The smaller the sidewall you use, the more likely you will spin your tires off the line. Taller sidewall tires can generally bite harder both under braking and acceleration.

If you’re looking to fit wheels that weigh less than stock, the larger you go in diameter, the more difficult and expensive it will be to find a lighter than stock wheel.

For Project Lexus, which I’ll be posting about later on, I chose to stick with the factory diameter of 17 inches since it already had a 45 section height tire. The factory wheel weighed in at roughly 22 lbs and we were able to find a replacement wheel, the Kosei KS T1 weighing in at only 14 lbs. I replaced all 5 wheels including the spare, losing about 40lbs in the process. 32 lbs of that was unsprung, rotational weight as discussed in section 1 of this series. I noted a small gain in city gas mileage (1 mpg on average), faster acceleration and a better ride.

Acceleration actually was measured between 35-60mph and showed a repeatable  and respectable improvement of just under 2 tenths of a second.

These wheels are just one of many lightweight wheels available in various sizes.

On some past Civic/Accord project cars, these cars tend to have very tall sidewalls. I have typically gone up to 15s or 16s on older Hondas to get to the 50ish sidewall height. For the new model Civic, a great upgrade for the non-Si models is to go for the Si or OEM optional sized wheels. The Si model actually already has the ideal size for the suspension.

In closing, check out the PDF at the end of the last part of this series (Part II). There’s some interesting tid bits in there about how running a lower profile tire actually affects center of gravity height. Granted, for most cars this change would be insignificant compared to an SUV. It’s interesting despite not being terribly relevant for most of my audience

Please be sure to post your comments and your questions, maybe some of them will inspire an article next week.

In the mean time, have a great weekend everyone, share articles with friends, comment and ask questions and I’ll see you back on Monday for another week of tech.

Related posts:

  1. Wheel Tech, Part IV: Tires – The Most Important Performance Part
  2. Wheel Tech, Part I: Wheel Weight Slows You Down
  3. Wheel Tech, Part II: Width Matters
  4. Rediculous Mods: The Problem with Lightweight Lug Nuts
  5. Ingenious Designs: OEM Brake Ducts
This entry was posted in Braking & Handling. Bookmark the permalink.

14 Responses to Wheel Tech, Part III: Wheel Diameter’s Effect on Performance

  1. Chy says:

    I have a 93 prelude with 215 45 17. Is that a good size or hurting me

    • Nathan says:

      Should be just fine for the Prelude/Accords. The width is a bit on the wider side, but as long as you’re not noticing any undesirable handling at the limit, I wouldn’t worry about it. I’ve run 205s on an Accord and it worked great, I don’t think the jump to 215 would be any different.

  2. Pingback: Good read on Wheel Width Considerations - my.IS - Lexus IS Forum

  3. Pingback: The great 17 vs. 18 debate - my.IS - Lexus IS Forum

  4. sharif says:

    hello..

    i’m really new at understanding wheels/tires size, weight, ratio etc.. read your articles and others and I’m still a bit undecided with where to go. i have a ’08 lexus is250 rwd. currently the wheels are 17″ and tires 225 45zr 17. i’m thinking 19″ 5zigen zr+250.. honestly all i care about is a sporty somewhat aggressive look but don’t want to sacrifice too much of the actual ride. will 19s take up the remaining space in the well or do i need coilovers to lower it half an inch (or inch)?

    thanks
    sharif

    • Nathan says:

      You’d be better off doing an Eibach pro-kit lowering spring or something similar on a stock shock. Cheap coilovers are junk and the correct ones are big money, and they’ll probably be too stiff for your liking. You can run 19s, if you want. I think an 18 would look plenty aggressive, but it’s all personal opinion on that if you don’t care about performance issues. A 19 will make you very nervous about any road imperfections however, for sure.

      Don’t ever try to fill wheel gap or whatever by changing full tire/wheel package size, that’s not the right way to do it and you’ll probably throw off your speedo and possibly effect ABS / other stability functions depending on how Lexus set up their sensors. I don’t know much about the IS250′s setup in that regard, but either way, it’s not the right way to do what you want to do. Do it right or you’ll regret it.

      Best,

      N

  5. sharif says:

    man thanks. that’s kinda what my gut has been telling me!

  6. sharif says:

    what does staggered mean? does it make a difference? I see that as an option for rwd is250.

    thanks

  7. Rohit says:

    I am having a VW Polo with a standard wheel size of 175/70/14 and i am planning it to upgrade it to wheel size 195/50/16. Please suggest that is this the right thing to do and what effects will it have on the car, the suspension and any other effects it can have.

  8. Marky says:

    I totally agree with your hypothesis: Big wheels means unwelcome weight that sucks power. I’m replacing the corroded alloy wheels on my ’03 Accord with the same size 16″ alloys from a RSX coupe. I believe the Honda rims are 22 lbs each and the Acura alloys are 16 lbs. So I save 24 pounds of unsprung weight. I was going to splurge on aluminum lug nuts until I read your article. You’re right: the nuts are too close to the hub to matter. No chrome valve caps tho! Keep up the great work.

  9. Improvised says:

    Wow…this is great stuff, Nathan! After weeks of trying to figure out why I really “needed” wider wheels, I was about to just go for it and get some wider-than-stalk wheels for my 08 STi. Then I read this. Now I’m going to stick with all the stock specs and just get lighter (and as strong or stronger) wheels. What you said all makes sense. It seems especially true with a car like the STi where performance matters a bit more than the average sedan. The designers/engineers I’m sure utilized the best wheel/tire fitment they could with the car’s relative features. Thanks so much for bringing it all together for me!

  10. shane says:

    From a performance aspect you want the smallest wheel that will clear the brake caliper. Additionally, the heaviest part of the wheel/tire combo is generally the tire and the further you push the tire away from the center axis the more performance takes a hit. You want the weight to be closest to the center axis as possible. to get an idea of what I am talking about, go to the bike bike section of any WalMart or KMart with a buddy. Take a kids 16″ (or smaller) bike, stand it up on the rear tire while you hold the handle bars, have your buddy turn the front wheel as fast as possible, then turn the handle bars back forth, left to right. Then do this on a mountain bike with a 22″ or 24″ wheel. You will see exactly the effect.

  11. Perry says:

    Hi Nathan,

    I am driving a BMW F10 with stock 225/55/17 . I have seen many guys fitted with a 245/35/20 front and 285/30/20 rear. Is it bad for the car? I have been thinking of changing it for a long time, but I am not sure about the ride quality, handling, braking distance…etc. after fitting those sizes of rims and tyres.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Perry ^_^

    • Nathan Morris says:

      Just because a lot of guys are doing something, doesn’t mean it’s a great plan. I’m sure the ride quality would degrade. Performance, probably but I can’t say as I’ve never actually tested that car or those combinations. Odds are good though that the OEM tire size or the M5 size would be good, the M5 though probably has different suspension from your F10, so that’s something to consider. Different suspension, different tires.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*


eight − = 3

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>